Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Carroll v. U.S.A. et al
as 3:2014cv00019
Plaintiff:
Donna Marie Carroll
Defendant:
U.S.A., Neil Murphy, Joelle Werner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Murphy
as 3:2013cv00223
Plaintiff:
Donna M. Carroll
Defendant:
Neil J. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Alliant Tax Credit Fund 31-A, LTD. v. Murphy et al
as 3:2013mc00027
Plaintiff:
Alliant Tax Credit Fund 31-A, LTD.
Defendant:
M. Vincent Murphy, III and Marilyn Murphy
Alliant Tax Credit Fund 31-A, LTD. et al v. Nicholasville Community Housing, LLC et al
as 3:2013mc00002
Plaintiff:
Alliant Tax Credit Fund 31-A, LTD., Alliant Tax Credit 31, Inc., Alliant Tax Credit Fund XXVII, LTD. and others
Defendant:
Nicholasville Community Housing, LLC, Jessamine Community Housing, LLC, Princeton Community Housing, LLC and others
McLaughlin v. Murphy et al
as 3:2013cv00002
Petitioner:
Michael Lee McLaughlin
Respondent:
Margaret L. Murphy and Joesph D. Schmit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arnett v. Murphy et al
as 3:2011cv00045
Plaintiff:
Marcus Gene Arnett
Defendant:
Steve Murphy , Edward Webster and Dean Fritz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLaughlin v. The Alaska Supreme Court et al
as 3:2010cv00272
Plaintiff:
Michael L. McLaughlin
Defendant:
The Alaska Supreme Court, Walter L. Carpeneti, Robert L. Eastuagh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shorthill et al v. Conley et al
as 3:2007cv00193
Plaintiff:
Carry Eugene Shorthill and Tina Rae
Defendant:
James M. Conley, Christopher Roger Nelson, Richard Dykstra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
City of Anchorage et al v. Trevor Murphy Cole et al
as 3:2007cv00050
Plaintiff:
City of Anchorage, State of Alaska, Andrew Granick and others
Defendant:
Trevor Murphy Cole and Brent Douglas Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
