Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Mitchell et al v. City of San Diego
as 3:2017cv02014
Plaintiff:
Candace Mitchell , Jennifer Becker , Keith Boothe and others
Defendant:
City of San Diego
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0207
McNeill v. Chicago Title et al
as 3:2017cv01326
Plaintiff:
Morgan McNeill
Defendant:
Chicago Title and Does 1 to 30
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Judy Henderson v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2016cv07374
Defendant:
Sheryl M. Bailey, Tyree Campbell, County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Judy Henderson
Efren Acosta et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05682
Plaintiff:
Efren Acosta, Peter Acosta, Rene Acosta and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Sauer et al v. County of El Dorado et al
as 2:2014cv01269
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sauer, Heather Graves, Deborah Tidwell and others
Defendant:
County of El Dorado, Nicole Williams, Alicia Tinsley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00096
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Form Inc v. S Joseph Green et al
as 2:2012cv10141
Plaintiff:
3Form Inc
Defendant:
McNeill Bishop and S Joseph Green
Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD. et al
as 2:2012cv03749
Counter Defendant:
Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC
Unknown:
Christopher T Hill, Christopher T Hill, Harold Gregory McNeill and others
Plaintiff:
Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Diane L McNeill v. Michael J Astrue
as 5:2012cv00304
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Diane L McNeill
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
