Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Barnett v. Polk County et al
as 3:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Andrew Barnett
Defendant:
Polk County, Polk County Sheriff's Office, Polk County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Barnett v. Polk County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
Andrew Barnett
Defendant:
Polk County Jail, Jail Sgt. Lowe, Jail Lt. Bittick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Polk County et al
as 3:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Andrew Barnett
Defendant:
Polk County, Mark Garton, Richard Bittick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Kristin Mayes, et al
as 23-15234
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellee:
KRISTIN K. MAYES, in her official capacity as Arizona Attorney General, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, JENNIFER CUNICO, o in her official capacity as Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Intervenor:
BEN TOMA and WARREN PETERSEN
Alleghany County, North Carolina et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv07039
Plaintiff:
Alleghany County, North Carolina, Anson County, North Carolina, Buncombe County, North Carolina and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
School District No. 2, Polk County, Oregon v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07062
Plaintiff:
School District No. 2, Polk County, Oregon and Dallas School District
Defendant:
Juul Labs Inc., Altria Group Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
School District No. 2, Polk County, Oregon v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01667
Plaintiff:
School District No. 2, Polk County, Oregon and Dallas School District
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
The School Board of Polk County, Florida v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv05578
Plaintiff:
The School Board of Polk County, Florida
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc., James Monsees, Adam Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 21-16711
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Attorney General of Arizona, in his official capacity, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, DON HERRINGTON, Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OR ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 21-16645
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Attorney General of Arizona, in his official capacity, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, DON HERRINGTON, Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OR ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
