Cases 11 - 20 of 658
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Celine Ponce v. CH2M Hill Engineers Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv10797
Plaintiff:
Celine Ponce
Defendant:
CH2M Hill Engineers, INC., Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc., Jacobs Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Martinez v. City of Santa Maria, et al.
as 23-4277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTEBAN MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SANTA MARIA, PHIL HANSEN, JESUS VALLE, No 19091 and others
Ramirez v. Pratt
as 3:2023cv02175
Petitioner:
Martin Ponce Ramirez
Respondent:
Glenn E. Pratt and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Julio Ponce Sagrero v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 8:2023cv01907
Plaintiff:
Julio Ponce Sagrero
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Skot Heckman, et al v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., et al
as 23-55770
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SKOT HECKMAN, LUIS PONCE, JEANENE POPP and others
Defendant / Appellant:
LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and TICKETMASTER, LLC
(PC) Ponce v. Ramadan et al
as 1:2023cv01193
Plaintiff:
Pablo Jesus Ponce
Defendant:
Ramadan and Hitchman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Castellon v. Warden
as 2:2023cv01408
Petitioner:
Javier Ponce Castellon
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Javier Castellon v. USA
as 23-55568
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAVIER PONCE CASTELLON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Delacruz v. Tanimura & Antle, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv03034
Plaintiff:
Daniel Delacruz
Defendant:
Tanimura & Antle, Inc., Mike Antle, Carmen Ponce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
