Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Wilson v. Mack et al
as 5:2010cv02870
Plaintiff:
Joseph C. Wilson
Defendant:
R Mack, F Tuvera, O. Swinsle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rademaker v. Hedgepeth et al
as 3:2010cv01659
Plaintiff:
David Rademaker
Defendant:
A. Hedgepeth, R Mack, L Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rademaker v. Hedgepeth et al
as 2:2010cv00804
Plaintiff:
David Rademaker
Defendant:
A. Hedgepeth, R Mack, L Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Tyler et al
as 5:2010cv01436
Plaintiff:
Eugene Hamilton
Defendant:
Debra Tyler, Marie Scherer, L. Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Hedgpeth et al
as 4:2009cv05225
Plaintiff:
G. Daniel Walker
Defendant:
A. Hedgpeth, L. D. Lewis, R. Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joan Mack v. Randal Kuckenmeister, et al
as 09-15291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOAN R. MACK, as Trustee of the Palace Jewelry & Loan Co., Inc. 401 (k) Profit Sharing Plan and Trust
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDAL S. KUCKENMEISTER, CPA, MST, as Administrator of the Estate of Charla Marie Mack, Deceased and DARREN ROY MACK, an individual
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, 1 through 50, inclusive
Joan Mack v. Randal Kuckenmeister, et al
as 09-15290
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOAN R. MACK, as Trustee of the Palace Jewelry & Loan Co., Inc. 401 (k) Profit Sharing Plan and Trust
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDAL S. KUCKENMEISTER, CPA, MST, as Administrator of the Estate of Charla Marie Mack, Deceased
Defendant - Appellant:
DARREN ROY MACK, an individual
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, 1 through 50, inclusive
Mack vs Kuckenmeister, et al
as 3:2008cv00370
Plaintiff:
Joan R Mack
Defendant:
Randal Kuckenmeister, Darren Roy Mack and Darren Roy Mack
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00080
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
