Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Nike, Inc. v. Millward et al
as 3:2015cv02281
Defendant:
Matthew Millward and Ralph Lauren Corporation
Plaintiff:
Nike, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv02289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Chris Martin v. Ralph Lauren Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv08132
Defendant:
Does, Macy s Inc. and Ralph Lauren Corporation
Plaintiff:
Chris Martin
Romero et al v. Macy's Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00815
Plaintiff:
Jesus Romero , Marcos Romero , Perla Romero and others
Defendant:
Macy's Inc. , Ralph Lauren Corporation and Does 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Indigo Group USA, Inc. v. Ralph Lauren Corporation
as 14-56429
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INDIGO GROUP USA, INC., a California corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
Indigo Group USA, Inc. v. Ralph Lauren Corporation
as 2:2014cv04657
Plaintiff:
Indigo Group USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Ralph Lauren Corporation
The Indigo Group USA, Inc. v. Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation
as 14-55579
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
INDIGO GROUP USA, INC., a California corporation, The
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
POLO RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
The Indigo Group USA Inc v. Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation
as 2:2011cv05883
Plaintiff:
Indigo Group USA Inc
Defendant:
Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation
Brian Korn v. Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation
as 2:2009cv04926
Plaintiff:
Brian Korn
Defendant:
Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation, Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation, Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Type:
Other Statutes
Korn v. Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation
as 2:2007at01202
Plaintiff:
Brian Korn
Defendant:
Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
