Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Gustavo Alvarez v. Commissioner Donald S. Kennedy et al
as 2:2012cv07329
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Alvarez
Defendant:
Sheriff Lee Baca, Sheriff Lee Baca, Gregorio Estedane and others
In re: Laurack Bray v. USDC-CALA
as 12-72501
:
In re: LAURACK D. BRAY
Petitioner:
LAURACK D. BRAY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General and others
Laurack D. Bray v. Department of Justice U.S. et al
as 2:2012cv05704
Real Party In Interest Defendant:
Jeanette M. Andrews, Helen H. Davis, Harold James Griffith and others
Defendant:
Andre Birotte, Department of Justice U.S., Patrick R. Donohue and others
Plaintiff:
Laurack D Bray
R. Wayne Johnson v. Robert Perry, et al
as 11-55548
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R. WAYNE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT PERRY and ELDEN FOX
R. Wayne Johnson v. Robert Perry et al
as 2:2011cv01560
Defendant:
Elden Fox, John-Jane Does and Robert Perry
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Johnson
Perry, et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, et al
as 2:2011cv00216
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and California Reconveyance Company
Plaintiff:
Robert Perry and Claudia Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robert Perry, et al v. National Default Servicing Cor, et al
as 10-16894
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT PERRY and TAMMY M. REY
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING CORPORATION (NDSC), KONDAUR CAPITAL CORPORATION, EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION and others
Sparknet Holdings, Inc. et al v. Robert Perry et al
as 2:2008cv08510
Defendant:
Indie Ranch Media, Inc., John Does, Netmix Broadcasting Network, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Robert Perry
Counter Defendant:
Sparknet Communications, L.P. and Sparknet Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sparknet Communications, L.P. and Sparknet Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
