Cases 11 - 20 of 978
Rahinah Ibrahim v. USDHS, et al
as 14-16161
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAHINAH IBRAHIM, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, TOM RIDGE, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Rahinah Ibrahim v. USDHS, et al
as 14-16160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAHINAH IBRAHIM, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, TOM RIDGE, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03802
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02162
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013at01194
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Ronald Baugh v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 13-35852
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD M. BAUGH
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ALBERTO GONZALES, former United States Attorney General, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06492
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv01298
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv01075
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
