Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Davis v. Kelso et al
as 1:2010cv01199
Plaintiff:
Charles T. Davis
Defendant:
Clark J. Kelso, James A. Yates, Felix Igbinosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Kelso et al
as 1:2010cv01184
Plaintiff:
Charles T. Davis
Defendant:
Clark J. Kelso, James A. Yates, Matthew Cate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. George
as 1:2010cv00210
Plaintiff:
Charles T. Davis
Defendant:
Ronald George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilmore, et al v. People of California
as 3:1966cv45878
Plaintiff:
Robert O. Gilmore, Jr. , Inmates of San Quentin State Prison and Willie Wisely
Defendant:
People of California
3rd_party_plaintiff:
Charles T. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Figueroa et al
as 3:2008cv01242
Plaintiff:
Charles Johnson
Defendant:
A Figueroa, T Davis, Preciado and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. Pineda et al
as 1:2008cv01076
Plaintiff:
Charles T. Davis
Defendant:
Pineda, Freeman and J. Yates
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Parks v. Tait et al
as 1:2008cv01031
Plaintiff:
Charles Austin Parks
Defendant:
R. Tait, R. Huff, T. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2007cv01855
Plaintiff:
Clifford J. Williams
Defendant:
California Deparment of Corrections, California Correctional Institution, Salinas Valley State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. CA Dept of Corrections et al
as 2:2007cv02726
Plaintiff:
Clifford J. Williams
Defendant:
CA Dept of Corrections, CSP Sacramento, T Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Astrue
as 3:2007cv05258
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Davis
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
