Cases 11 - 20 of 127
USA v. Terry Keehn, II
as 23-30031
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRY LEE KEEHN II, AKA Terry Keehn
USA v. Terry Schneider, II
as 22-10340
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRY LEE SCHNEIDER II
Dunn v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07587
Plaintiff:
Terrie Lee Dunn
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nichols v. Credit Associates, LLC
as 5:2022cv08975
Plaintiff:
Terri Lee Nichols
Defendant:
Credit Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Teerry Lee Best v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv07879
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Best
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Terry Lee Hill v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv03347
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Hill
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Nichols v. 360 Financial Group LLC
as 5:2022cv03899
Plaintiff:
Terri Lee Nichols
Defendant:
360 Financial Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Nichols v. Meredian Inc.
as 5:2022cv03897
Plaintiff:
Terri Lee Nichols
Defendant:
Meredian Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Brenda Johnson v. USA, et al
as 22-35044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENDA M. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES and others
Ascentium Capital, LLC v. Rostad et al
as 9:2021cv00150
Plaintiff:
Ascentium Capital, LLC
Defendant:
Craig Alex Rostad and Terry Lee Cleveland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
