Cases 11 - 20 of 214
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
X CORP., Successor in Interest to TWITTER, INC. v. Bonta
as 24-271
Plaintiff / Appellant:
X CORP., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO TWITTER, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California
Doe 1, et al. v. Twitter, Inc., et al.
as 24-177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Defendant / Appellee:
TWITTER, INC. and X CORP., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO TWITTER, INC.
Morgan v. Twitter, Inc.
as 23-3764
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLEN MORGAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
TWITTER, INC.
Cresa Global Inc. v. Twitter Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv04642
Plaintiff:
Cresa Global Inc.
Defendant:
Twitter Inc. and X Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Richard Jackson et al v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv09438
Plaintiff:
RICHARD JACKSON, JULIE BRIGGS and GREGG BUCHWALTER
Defendant:
TWITTER, INC., GOOGLE, LLC, ALPHABET, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Justin Hart v. Facebook, Inc., et al
as 23-15858
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN HART
Defendant / Appellee:
FACEBOOK, INC., TWITTER, INC., VIVEK MURTHY, in his official capacity as United States Surgeon General and others
Loomer et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc et al
as 3:2022cv02646
Plaintiff:
Laura Loomer and Laura Loomer for Congress, Inc.
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc., Mark Zuckerberg, Twitter, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. v. Twitter, Inc.
as 4:2023mc80176
Plaintiff:
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc.
Johnson v. Facebook et al
as 3:2023cv05788
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson
Defendant:
Facebook, Meta, Rudy Giuliani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
