Cases 11 - 20 of 546
Shami v. Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service
as 1:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Nasser Shami Doing business as Orosi Market
Defendant:
Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
North Cascades Conservation Council v. United States Forest Service, et al.
as 24-1422
Plaintiff:
NORTH CASCADES CONSERVATION COUNCIL, A nonprofit Washington corporation
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, A federal agency of the United States Department of Agriculture and KRISTIN BAIL, In her official capacity as Forest Supervisor, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest, United States Forest Service
United States of America, et al. v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Eugene, et al.
as 24-684
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, in her official capacity as Director of Council on Environmental Quality, SHAUN DONOVAN, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Management and Budget and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Defendant:
STATE OF ALABAMA
Not Classified By Court:
XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske-Martinez, ALEXANDER LOZNAK, JACOB LEBEL and others
Intervenor:
THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Carpenter v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Kathy Carpenter
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Agriculture, United States Forest Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Smith, et al. v. Tumalo Irrigation District, et al.
as 24-70
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMES SMITH, PAUL CALLEN, KATHY POWELL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TUMALO IRRIGATION DISTRICT, RONALD ALVARADO, in his official capacity as State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture and NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE, a federal agency of the United States Department of Agriculture
Pratum Farm, LLC v. United States Department of Agriculture
as 6:2023cv01525
Plaintiff:
Pratum Farm, LLC
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Western Watersheds Project, et al. v. Perdue, et al.
as 23-3872
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, a non-profit organization and WILDERNESS WATCH, a non-profit organization
Defendant / Appellee:
SONNY PERDUE, as Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, a federal department, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a federal agency and others
Joyce Burrus v. USDA, et al
as 23-16203
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOYCE M. BURRUS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, VICTORIA CHRISTIANSEN, Chief and others
WildEarth Guardians, et al. v. United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Wildlife Services, et al.
as 23-2944
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE WILDLIFE SERVICES, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Natural Grocers, et al v. Thomas Vilsack, et al
as 22-16770
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATURAL GROCERS, CITIZENS FOR GMO LABELING, LABEL GMOS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS VILSACK, Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture, BRUCE SUMMERS, Administrator of the Agricultural Marketing Services and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, UNITED STATES BEET SUGAR ASSOCIATION and AMERICAN SUGARBEET GROWERS ASSOCIATION
Amicus Curiae:
NON-GMO PROJECT and HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
