Cases 11 - 20 of 39,077
Ackerman v. Rigney et al
as 2:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
Curtis Rigney, T. Phelps, William Gittere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Azcarate v. Williams, et al.
as 24-3174
Petitioner:
RAY ANTONIO AZCARATE
Respondent:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Furtado v. Calipatria State Prison
as 4:2024cv02967
Plaintiff:
Andre William Furtado
Defendant:
Calipatria State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliverio-Still v. AVMAC LLC
as 3:2024cv00870
Plaintiff:
Eric William Oliverio-Still
Defendant:
AVMAC LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Nicholls v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Timothy William Nicholls
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lomax v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00924
Petitioner:
Nathan Louis Lomax
Respondent:
Brian Williams, NDOC and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2024cv00923
Plaintiff:
JoAquin Hill
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Nevada Department of Corrections, Ely State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05378
Plaintiff:
William Reynolds
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Finnegan v. O'Malley
as 24-3131
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. FINNEGAN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Edmiston v. Saucedo, et al.
as 24-3145
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN EDMISTON
Defendant:
RICARDO SAUCEDO, JAMES WEILAND, C.E.R.T. "Senior and WILLIAM GITTERE, added per #7 Screening Order; #8 AC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
