Cases 11 - 20 of 566
Hundal v. Islas, et al.
as 24-2303
Plaintiff:
GURKIRN HUNDAL
Defendant:
RUBEN ISLAS, JR., MARTHA ISLAS ENRIQUEZ, JOE ZUNIGA and others
RS Real Estate Plus v. Jaime R. Sanchez et al
as 8:2024cv00685
Plaintiff:
RS Real Estate Plus
Defendant:
Jaime R. Sanchez, Ana Zuniga Moreno and Does 1 to 10
Dawes v. Ausbury, et al.
as 24-1924
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAWES
Defendant:
HOWARD AUSBURY, Lt. at RJD, MARIO ZUNIGA, Correctional Officer, SHELLANO, Correctional Officer and others
RS Real Estate Plus v. Jaime R. Sanchez et al
as 8:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
RS Real Estate Plus
Defendant:
Jaime R. Sanchez, Ana Zuniga Moreno, Ermer J. Sanchez and others
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas, Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01719
Defendant:
Doe 16, Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gurkirn Hundal v. Ruben Islas Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
Gurkirn Hundal
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas, Martha Islas Enriquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Almidon-Miranda, et al. v. Garland
as 24-634
Petitioner:
GEORGE BRIAN ALMIDON-MIRANDA, YESENIA L ROMERO-ZUNIGA and GAHELA L ROMERO-ZUNIGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Zuniga v. Hartman et al
as 3:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Zuniga
Defendant:
Hartman, Eric Wood, Willhite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zuniga v. Gowan Milling, LLC, et al.
as 23-4091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIBEL ZUNIGA
Defendant / Appellee:
GOWAN MILLING, LLC
Defendant:
LOURDES GONZALEZ and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Jane and John Doe 1-10; ABC Companies 1-10; XYZ Corps. 1-10; and ABC Partnerships 1-10
Gurkirn Hundal v. Ruben Islas et al
as 2:2023cv10201
Plaintiff:
Gurkirn Hundal
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Marth Enriquez, Joel Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
