Cases 21 - 30 of 1,142,476
F. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv06589
Defendant:
Rasier-CA, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Plaintiff:
N. F.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hawkes v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv06568
Defendant:
Instagram, LLC, Siculus, Inc., Facebook Operations, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Quinn Hawkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Debari et al v. Winix Global LLC et al
as 3:2024cv06596
Plaintiff:
Cory Debari, Julian Nava and Taylor-Anne Harris
Defendant:
Winix Global LLC and Winix America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lovette v. City of Oakland, et al.
as 3:2024cv06592
Defendant:
Anna Sanchez, Walgreens Specialty Pharmacy, LLC, On Watch LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Lamayah Lovette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
A.L. v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv06580
Plaintiff:
A.L.
Defendant:
United States of America, Darrell Wayne Smith and Ray J. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06583
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Cone v. Corcoran State Prison Warden
as 3:2024cv06570
Respondent:
Corcoran State Prison Warden
Petitioner:
Chris M. Cone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Hill v. Haroing et al
as 4:2024cv06571
Defendant:
Silva, Gambet, Haroing and others
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Millet et al
as 4:2024cv06572
Defendant:
Tom, Millet, Silva and others
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
