Cases 21 - 30 of 1,582
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Moore v. Warden Oliver et al
as 2:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Allan Moore
Defendant:
Warden Oliver, Chief Witmore, O.M.D. and Director Dzurenda, Doc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRPV XIV Olive LA, LLC v. Cierra Brooks
as 2:2024cv01972
Plaintiff:
WRPV XIV Olive LA, LLC
Defendant:
Cierra Brooks
Interested Party:
Wesley Ember
Milgrim v. Garcia, et al.
as 24-1836
Plaintiff:
JARED RYAN MILGRIM, an individual
Defendant:
ALFREDO GARCIA, an individual, KIRAN KAMAT, an individual, ELAIN LEVY, an individual and others
Henderson v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Henderson
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson, Brian Williams, Sr., Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson et al v. Amazon.com Inc
as 2:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Timothy Peterson, Ashley Scarborough, Daleene Fox and others
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Allen v. Oliver
as 2:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Derrick B. Allen
Defendant:
Ronald Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Combs v. Oliver et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Matthew Combs
Defendant:
Oliver, Sr. C/O Tate, Tanya Asher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reyes-Robles, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1378
Petitioner:
ALONDRA REYES-ROBLES, RIGOBERTO MARTINEZ-GRANDE, EITHAN RIGOBERTO MARTINEZ-REYES and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
