Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Center for Bio. Diversity, et al v. FHWA, et al
as 17-56080
Plaintiff - Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, SIERRA CLUB, FRIENDS OF THE NORTHERN SAN JACINTO VALLEY and others
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, GREGORY G. NADEAU, Administrator and VINCENT MAMMANO, Division Administrator
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
Gila River Indian Community, et al v. FHWA, et al
as 16-16605
Plaintiff - Appellant: GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY
Plaintiff: PROTECTING ARIZONA'S RESOURCES AND CHILDREN, FOOTHILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, FOOTHILLS CLUB WEST COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, KARLA PETTY, in her official capacity as the Arizona Division Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration and ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Protecting Arizona's Resources, et al v. FHWA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-16586
Plaintiff - Appellant: PROTECTING ARIZONA'S RESOURCES AND CHILDREN, FOOTHILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, FOOTHILLS CLUB WEST COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff: GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, KARLA PETTY, in her official capacity as the Arizona Division Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration and ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Paradise Ridge Defense Coalition, Inc. v. Hartman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00374
Plaintiff: Paradise Ridge Defense Coalition
Defendant: Peter J Hartman , Federal Highway Administration and Idaho Transportation Department
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Center For Biological Diversity et al v. Federal Highway Administration et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00133
Plaintiff: Center For Biological Diversity, Friends of the Northern San Jacinto Valley, San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society and others
Defendant: Federal Highway Administration, Vincent Mammano and Gregory G. Nadeau
Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians of California, et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv04987
Defendant: United States Department of Transportation, Anthony Foxx, Federal Highway Administration and others
Plaintiff: Round Valley Indian Tribes of California and Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Gila River Indian Community v. Federal Highway Administration et al
as 2:2015cv01219
Plaintiff: Gila River Indian Community
Defendant: Federal Highway Administration , Karla S Petty , Arizona Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362
Protecting Arizona's Resources and Children et al v. Federal Highway Administration et al
as 2:2015cv00893
Plaintiff: Protecting Arizona's Resources and Children , Foothills Community Association , Foothills Club West Community Association and others
Defendant: Federal Highway Administration , Karla Petty and Arizona Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Pacificans for a Scenic Coast et al v. Federal Highway Administration et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv02090
Plaintiff: Pacificans for a Scenic Coast , Pacificans for Highway 1 Alternatives and Center For Biological Diversity
Defendant: Federal Highway Administration, California Department of Transportation, Malcolm Dougherty and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Stan Bitters et al v. Federal Highway Administration et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01646
Plaintiff: Stan Bitters , Patty Bartucci , Ray Perez and others
Defendant: Federal Highway Administration, Gregory G. Nadeau, California Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?