Cases 21 - 30 of 834
Matthew Powell v. M. Barron, et al
as 16-16620
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW LAMONT POWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
M. BARRON, Correctional Officer @ CSP-Corcoran, R. GOINGS, Correctional Officer at CSP-Corcoran, I. RIVERA and others
Wimberly v. Malmendier, et al
as 2:2016cv00279
Plaintiff:
Larry Wimberly
Defendant:
Jeffery Beard , A. Brager , N. Grannis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Matthew Powell v. Barron et al
as 1:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
Matthew Powell
Defendant:
M. Barron, R. Goings, I. Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Granny's Alliance Holdings, Inc., et al v. Farrow Construction Specialties Inc.
as 3:2014mc05025
Plaintiff:
Granny's Alliance Holdings, Inc., et al
Defendant:
Farrow Construction Specialties Inc.
Gregory Norwood v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 14-17059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY LYNN NORWOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW L. CATE, Director of Prisons, KENNETH CLARK, Warden, K. ALLISON, Warden and others
Mustafa Wright v. N. Grannis, et al
as 14-56643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MUSTAFA WRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
N. GRANNIS, Chief of Appeals for CDCR, SILVA H. GARCIA, Chief Deputy Warden, E. A. CONTRERAS, Associate Warden and others
Alvaro Quezada v. A. Hedgpeth, et al
as 14-16974
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALVARO QUEZADA
Defendant - Appellee:
A. HEDGPETH, J.D. SOTO, Captain, E. G. FLORES, Captain and others
Granny's Alliance Holdings, Inc., et al v. Farrow Construction Specialities, Inc., et al
as 3:2014mc05021
Plaintiff:
Granny's Alliance Holdings, Inc., et al
Defendant:
Farrow Construction Specialities, Inc., et al
Lawrence Hash v. Charles Lee, et al
as 14-16727
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE GEORGE HASH
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES DUDLEY LEE, Health Care Manager, SVSP, J. G. ARCEO, C. BLACKSTONE and others
Mario Navarro v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 14-56024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO LOUIS NAVARRO
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, DAVID LONG, MORENO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
