Cases 21 - 30 of 899
(PC) Harper v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv01156
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
Clayborne Williams and Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holly Harper v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2024cv03135
Petitioner:
Holly Harper
Respondent:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Harper v. Amur Equipment Finance, Inc, et al.
as 24-2413
Plaintiff:
JOHN HARPER
Defendant:
AMUR EQUIPMENT FINANCE, INC, WATSON & CHELIN MANUFACTERING, INC and ARTISAN AND TRUCKERS CASUALTY COMPANY
(PC) Harper v. Powell, et al.
as 1:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
B Powell, S. Arana, J Grove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harpers Pharmacy, Inc. v. Federal Express Corporation et al
as 8:2024cv00801
Plaintiff:
Harpers Pharmacy, Inc. DBA Ameripharma and Harpers Pharmacy, Inc. a California Corporation doing business as Ameripharma
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation, FedEx Corporation and Does 2 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Ideal Landscaping and Concrete LLC v. RS Security Consulting Limited et al
as 3:2024cv08055
Plaintiff:
Ideal Landscaping and Concrete LLC
Defendant:
RS Security Consulting Limited, 3B Protection International Incorporated, Joseph Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Daniel Harper v. California State Prison Lancaster et al
as 2:2024cv01789
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Harper
Defendant:
California State Prison Lancaster and CSP Lancaster Mail Room
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel James Harper v. CSP Lancaster et al
as 2:2024cv01748
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Harper
Defendant:
CSP Lancaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
