Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 362
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 22-16537
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Appellant: LAW OFFICES OF FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA
Defendant: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Bonsignore Trial Lawyers, LLC, et al
as 22-16678
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION and CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Appellee: BONSIGNORE TRIAL LAWYERS, LLC, GRAY ECHAVARRIA, GLORIA COMEAUX and others
Defendant: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice et al
as 3:2022cv01419
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: Louisiana Department of Justice, State of Louisiana, City of Baton Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jane Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice, et al
as 22-35752
Plaintiff / Appellant: JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee: LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT STATE OF LOUISIANA, CITY OF BATON ORGANIZATIONS ACT AND ROUGE AND PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE and others
Surina et al v. NuScale Power, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01410
Plaintiff: John J. Surina, Jr., Bruce Landrey, Paul Lorenzini and others
Defendant: NuScale Power, LLC, Fluor Enterprises, Inc., Japan Nuscale Innovation, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01056
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: Louisiana Department of Justice, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt State of Louisiana, City of Baton Organizations Act and Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jane Doe v. USDC-ORPIn re: Jane Doe v. USDC-ORP
as 22-70230
Not Classified By Court: In re: JANE DOE, LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Petitioner: JANE DOE
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PORTLAND
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. v. Luxshare Precision Industry Co., Ltd. et al
as 5:2022cv04781
Plaintiff: Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Luxshare Precision Industry Co., Ltd., Luxshare-ICT, Inc., Luxshare Precision Limited (HK) and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Jane Doe v. City of Baton Rouge, et al
as 22-35572
Plaintiff / Appellant: JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF BATON ROUGE, CITY OF BATON ROUGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES WEBER and others
Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice et al
as 6:2022cv01065
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: Louisiana Department of Justice, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt State of Louisiana, City of Baton Organizations Act and Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?