Cases 21 - 30 of 5,420
Tyrece Jefferson v. G. Guillen et al
as 2:2024cv00972
Plaintiff:
Tyrece Jefferson
Defendant:
K. Guillen and C. Lomeli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
(PC) Jefferson v. Guillen et al
as 2:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Tyrece Jefferson
Defendant:
K. Guillen and C. Lomeli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon Favor et al v. Marcus Charles Stevenson et al
as 2:2024cv00650
Plaintiff:
Brandon Favor LLP and Marcus Charles Musamite
Defendant:
Bremnem Michael Stevenson, Vision Records Inc. and James Jefferson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGee v. State of California, et al.
as 24-393
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERSON A. MCGEE
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and others
Jason Zoladz et al v. AGA Service Company et al
as 2:2024cv00584
Plaintiff:
Jason Zoladz and Katharine Zoladz
Defendant:
AGA Service Company doing business as Allianz Global Assistance and Jefferson Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Matute Hernandez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-220
Petitioner:
LUIS ALBERTO MATUTE HERNANDEZ, JEFFERSON ALEXANDER MATUTE-VALLE and FLOR DE MARIA VALLE-GOMEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
