Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Ryan II v. Lopez et al
as 6:2012cv01467
Defendant:
Stephanie Lopez and Donald W. Ryan
Plaintiff:
John Norman Ryan II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Ryan, II v. Stephanie Lopez, et al
as 11-35800
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN NORMAN RYAN, II
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHANIE LOPEZ, CRAIG ROBERTS, OREGON STATE HOSPITAL and others
Ryan v. Oregon Health Authority
as 6:2011cv01040
Respondent:
Oregon Health Authority
Petitioner:
John Norman Ryan, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Ryan v. Lopez et al
as 3:2011cv00908
Defendant:
Marc Abrams, Carl Goodman, John Harlan and others
Plaintiff:
John Norman Ryan, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Ryan v. John Harlan, et al
as 11-35264
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN NORMAN RYAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN HARLAN, Probation Officer, CARL GOODMAN, Assistant Director, Mulnomah Co. Community Justice, Adult Services Division, KEVIN BOWERS, Community Justice Supervisor and others
Ryan v. Adgers et al
as 3:2010cv00885
Defendant:
Deputy John Doe 1, Raymond Adgers, Kevin Bowers and others
Plaintiff:
John Norman Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ryan v. Harlan et al
as 3:2010cv00626
Defendant:
Michael Anderson, Kevin Bowers, Carl Goodman and others
Plaintiff:
John Norman Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Ryan v. Eric Lee, et al
as 09-36119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN NORMAN RYAN
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC LEE, Attorney at Law, DONALD TRUE, Doctor, METROPOLITAN PUBLIC DEFENDERS INCORPORATED and others
John Ryan v. Multnomah County District Atto, et al
as 09-35938
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN NORMAN RYAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MULTNOMAH COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, MICHAEL SCHRUNK, ADAM GREENMAN and others
Ryan v. Kantor et al
as 3:2009cv00996
Plaintiff:
John Norman Ryan
Defendant:
Henry Kantor, Amber Mosier, Natasha Dolezal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
