Cases 21 - 30 of 79
Demos v. Jackson et al
as 3:2022cv05480
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Rob M Jackson, Jay Inslee and Cheryl Strange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Demos, Jr. v. Robert Jackson, et al
as 22-35514
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT M. JACKSON, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary, CARIA SCHETTLER, Associate Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary and CHERYL STRANGE, Secretary, Washington State Department of Corrections
Demos v. Strange et al
as 3:2022cv05464
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Robert M Jackson, Jay Robert Inslee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Jackson
as 4:2022cv05079
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
Rob M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allah v. Jackson
as 4:2022cv05072
Petitioner:
Allah
Respondent:
Rob M Jackson doing business as Sup of WSP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Jackson
as 4:2022cv05043
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
Robert M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Jackson
as 4:2022cv05044
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
Robert M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Jackson
as 4:2022cv05045
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
Robert M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Jackson
as 4:2022cv05042
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
Robert M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Jackson et al
as 3:2022cv05083
Plaintiff:
John R Demos and John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Robert M Jackson, Caria Schettler and Cheryl Strange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
