Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Montgomery v. Warden Green et al
as 9:2016cv00132
Petitioner:
Matthew Lynn Montgomery
Respondent:
Warden Green and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 4:2016cv00006
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery and Todd Strange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lietzke v. County of Montgomery et al
as 6:2015cv00007
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
County of Montgomery, Reese McKinney and D.T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 4:2015cv00011
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Todd Strange and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 4:2014cv00096
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Todd Strange and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Montgomery v. Green et al
as 9:2013cv00181
Petitioner:
Matthew Lynn Montgomery
Respondent:
T. Green and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Montgomery v. Kennerly et al
as 4:2013cv00017
Plaintiff:
J.C. Montgomery
Defendant:
Blackfeet Tribal Police, Bureau of Indain Affairs, Glacier County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Castro et al v ExxonMobil Oil et al
as 1:2011cv00119
Plaintiff:
Tina Castro , College Park , Jim Edwards and others
Defendant:
ExxonMobil Oil , ExxonMobil Pipeline , Jon R. Wetmore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Montgomery v. Frink et al
as 9:2011cv00121
Petitioner:
Matthew Lynn Montgomery
Respondent:
Martin Frink and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Montgomery v. Fink
as 9:2011cv00120
Respondent:
State of Montana and Martin Fink
Petitioner:
Matthew Lynn Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
