Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 34
John Teixeira, et al v. County of Alameda, et al
as 13-17132
Amicus Curiae: FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, YOUTH ALIVE!, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: STEVE NOBRIGA, JOHN TEIXEIRA, GARY GAMAZA and others
Defendant / Appellee: NATE MILEY, in his official capacity, ALAMEDA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, as a policy making body, WILMA CHAN, in her official capacity and others
Ctr for Biological Diversity, et al v. USFS
as -16671
Plaintiff / Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, SIERRA CLUB and GRAND CANYON WILDLANDS COUNCIL
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC.,, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Ctr for Biological Diversity, et al v. USFS
as 13-16684
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC.,, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: GRAND CANYON WILDLANDS COUNCIL, SIERRA CLUB and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Espanola Jackson, et al v. City and County of San Francis, et al
as 12-17803
Amicus Curiae: MAJOR CITIES CHIEFS ASSOCIATION, THE LINCOLN INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH,, The Abraham Lincoln Foundation for Public Policy Research, Institute on the Constitution, Conservative Legal Defense and Education Fund, and Policy Analysis Center, CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: THOMAS BOYER, DAVID GOLDEN, ESPANOLA JACKSON and others
Defendant / Appellee: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, EDWIN M. LEE, Mayor for the City and County of San Francisco and GREG SUHR, San Francisco Police Chief
Espanola Jackson, et al v. City and County of San Francis, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-17803
Plaintiff - Appellant: ESPANOLA JACKSON, PAUL COLVIN, THOMAS BOYER and others
Defendant - Appellee: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, EDWIN M. LEE, Mayor for the City and County of San Francisco and GREG SUHR, San Francisco Police Chief
Christopher Baker v. Louis Kealoha, et al
as 12-16258
Amicus Curiae: BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., COUNTY OF MAUI and others
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF HAWAII, NEIL ABERCROMBIE, in his official capacity as Hawaii Governor, CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHRISTOPHER BAKER
Bauer et al
as 1:2011at00526
Plaintiff: Barry Bauer , Stephen Warkentin , Nicole Ferry and others
Defendant: Kamala D. Harris, Stephen Lindley and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bauer, et al. vs. Harris, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01440
Plaintiff: Barry Bauer , Stephen Warkentin , Nicole Ferry and others
Defendant: Kamala D. Harris, Stephen Lindley and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alliance for the Wild Rockies, et al v. Ken Salazar, et al
as 11-35568
Plaintiff - Appellee: ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES, FRIENDS OF THE CLEARWATER, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and others
Applicant-in-intervention: ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK FOUNDATION, INC., ARIZONA SPORTSMEN FOR WILDLIFE, BIG GAME FOREVER, LLC and others
Defendant: KEN SALAZAR, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Interior, ROWAN GOULD, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant: SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL and NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC.
Adam Richards, et al v. Ed Prieto, et al
as 11-16255
Amicus Curiae: MAJOR CITIES CHIEFS ASSOCIATION, LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTION NETWORK, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, ADAM RICHARDS, CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF YOLO and ED PRIETO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?