Cases 21 - 30 of 33
GemCap Lending I, LLC v. Associated Management Consultants, Inc.
as 2:2015cv07806
Defendant:
Associated Management Consultants, Inc., Jane K Conner, Does and others
Plaintiff:
GemCap Lending I, LLC
Yartz v. Coalinga State Hospital et al
as 1:2015cv00006
Plaintiff:
Norman E. Yartz
Defendant:
Coalinga State Hospital, Luke Koll and James Petterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Ashley et al
as 2:2014cv01306
Plaintiff:
Kevin E. King
Defendant:
Aaron Ashley, Scott Petterson, Cal Force Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gorum v. Cox et al
as 2:2013cv01412
Defendant:
James G. Cox, Neven, Petterson and others
Plaintiff:
Antoine Gorum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Petterson v. Playphone, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01760
Plaintiff:
William D. Petterson
Defendant:
Playphone, Inc. , AT&T Mobility, LLC and Does 1 to 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Shawn Woodall v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 10-56428
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN JAMES ALLEN WOODALL
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, DEBRA BOWEN, MATTHEW CATE and others
Woodall v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2010cv01218
Plaintiff:
Shawn Woodall
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Debra Bowen, Matthew Cate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buckfire v. Sinegal et al
as 2:2009cv00893
Plaintiff:
Daniel Buckfire
Defendant:
James D Sinegal, Jeffrey H Brotman, Richard A Galanti and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Petterson v. Benedetti et al
as 3:2008cv00681
Plaintiff:
Gary Petterson
Defendant:
James Benedetti, Don Helling, Robbinson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation Retiree Medical Benefits Trust v. Sinegal et al
as 2:2008cv01450
Plaintiff:
Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation Retiree Medical Benefits Trust
Defendant:
James D Sinegal, Jeffrey H Brotman, Richard A Galanti and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
