Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Andrew Tarrow v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al
as 8:2017cv01568
Defendant: DOES, Daniel Harrington, Staci Meyer and others
Plaintiff: Andrew Tarrow
Engel v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al., We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00618
Plaintiff: Julius M. Engel
Defendant: R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and Philip Morris USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01229
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Farid Malek et al v. Blackmer Pump Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv04454
Defendant: BP America Inc., BP P.L.C., BW IP, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Farid Malek and Mary Malek
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv07799
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Reynolds Innovations Incorporated et al v. HEF LLC et al
as 2:2011cv02447
Plaintiff: Reynolds Innovations Incorporated and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
Defendant: HEF LLC, Fawaz Kanaan, Hazim Areket and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-17517
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-17192
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-17169
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv02495
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?