Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Zachary Silbersher, et al v. Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-16256
Not Classified By Court: ADAMAS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant: VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD., SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellant: DR. FALK PHARMA GMBH
Plaintiff / Appellee: ZACHARY SILBERSHER, Relator
Zachary Silbersher, et al v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals Intern, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-16176
Not Classified By Court: ADAMAS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee: VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC., SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD., DR. FALK PHARMA GMBH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ZACHARY SILBERSHER, Relator
Mikkel Jordahl, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 18-16896
Amicus Curiae: LAWRENCE GLICKMAN, Professor at Cornell University, 25 ARIZONA LEGISLATORS, GOVERNOR OF ARIZONA, STATE OF KANSAS and others
Defendant: MATT RYAN, JIM PARKS, in their official capacity as Coconino County Jail District Board of Directors Members, ART BABBOTT and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: MIKKEL JORDAHL and MIKKEL (MIK) JORDAHL, PC
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: STATE OF ARIZONA
Defendant / Appellant: MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Arizona Attorney General
The Dan Abrams Company LLC, et al v. Medtronic Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-56377
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee: MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK DEGGENDORF GMBH, MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: THE DAN ABRAMS COMPANY LLC, Relator
The Dan Abrams Company LLC, et al v. Medtronic Inc., et al
as 19-55995
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee: MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK DEGGENDORF GMBH, MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: THE DAN ABRAMS COMPANY LLC, Relator
Jacob Bergeron v. Unknown Agents of the State of Georgia
as 2:2019cv07043
Petitioner: Jacob Bergeron
Respondent: Unknown Agents of the State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. State of California et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00490
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: State of California , Edmund Gerald Brown, Jr. and Xavier Becerra
Amicu: American Center for Law and Justice , State of Texas , State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Azael Perales v. FBI, et al
as 17-56213
Plaintiff - Appellant: AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Training Academy, National Academy, ALBANY, Counties Covered: Albany, Fulton, Hamilton, Montgomery, Rensselaer, Saratoga, Schenectady, Schoharie, Warren, and Washington, ALBUQUERQUE, Counties Covered: Bernalillo, Catron, Cibola (eastern half Guadalupe, Quay, Sandoval, Soccorro, Torrence and Valencia and others
Bergeron v. Multiple and Several State Agents (Washington) et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00821
Plaintiff: Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Defendant: Multiple and Several State Agents (Washington), Multiple and Several Unknown State Agents (Georgia) and Multiple and Several Unknown State Agents (California)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Laptop & Desktop Repair LLC et al
as 3:2016ms00010
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission and State of Georgia, United States of America
Receiver: S. Gregory Hays and Hays Financial Consulting, LLC
Defendant: Vadim Olegovich Kruchinin and Laptop & Desktop Repair LLC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?