Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 244
Northfield Ins. Co. v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01505
Defendant: Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. Doing business as Techtronic Industries North America, Inc., Samsung SDI and others
Plaintiff: Northfield Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kimmel v. Samsung SDI America Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv02802
Defendant: Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon.Com Services, Inc., Samsung SDI America Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Mr. Scott Kimmel and Scott Kimmel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-15697
Petitioner / Appellant: HARRY GARAVANIAN, CHRIS SEUFERT, KERRY MURPHY and others
Defendant / Appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Stanley v. Samsung SDI America, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv03023
Plaintiff: Eric Stanley
Defendant: Samsung SDI America, Inc. and Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Irico Group Corporation, et al
as 19-17428
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS and DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Defendant: SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD., THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC., SAMSUNG SDI BRASIL LTDA. and others
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Defendant / Appellant: IRICO GROUP CORPORATION and IRICO DISPLAY DEVICES CO., LTD.
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Panasonic Corporation, et al
as 19-16855
Defendant / Appellee: LG CHEM, LTD., HITACHI MAXWELL, LTD., SANYO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court: In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Yet Classified: GORDON B. MORGAN
Christopher Andrews, et al v. Panasonic Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-16803
Defendant / Appellee: NEC TOKIN CORPORATION, LG CHEM, LTD., HITACHI MAXWELL, LTD. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court: In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Yet Classified: CHRISTOPHER ANDREWS
North v. Samsung SDI America, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv05621
Defendant: Samsung SDI America, Inc. and Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
Plaintiff: Joseph North
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel Ramirez v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv05305
Defendant: Samsung Electrionics America, Inc., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI America Inc and others
Plaintiff: Daniel Ramirez
Cross Defendant: Amperex Technology Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Acer Incorporated et al v. Samsung SDI Co., Ltd et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv01948
Plaintiff: Gateway U.S. Retail, Inc., Acer Inc., Acer America Corporation and others
Defendant: Samsung SDI Co. Ltd, Samsung SDI America Inc, Hitachi Maxell, Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?