Cases 21 - 30 of 1,224
Suta Cuestas, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1284
Petitioner:
MANUEL ANDRES SUTA CUESTAS, YENNY ANGELICA AYALA VELASQUEZ, KEVIN SANTIAGO SUTA AYALA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
De Santiago-Mendoza v. Garland
as 24-1293
Petitioner:
MARTIN DE SANTIAGO-MENDOZA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
(PC) DeLeon v. Phillips et al
as 1:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Vincent DeLeon
Defendant:
Bryan Phillips, J. Ervin, J. Sherman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Barrett Business Services, Inc. v. Colmenero, et al.
as 24-770
Plaintiff:
BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
CHARLES COLMENERO, DENELL HOPKINS, and the marital community comprised thereof, SANTIAGO ALEJO and others
Castaneda-Castaneda, et al. v. Garland
as 24-613
Petitioner:
OMAR CASTANEDA-CASTANEDA, ESTER SARAI RIVAS-TEJADA and SANTIAGO ALEXANDER CASTANEDA-RIVAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Terry Fabricant et al v. Pro Source Lending Group LLC
as 2:2024cv00795
Plaintiff:
Terry Fabricant and Isaac Santiago
Defendant:
Pro Source Lending Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jehu Bello et al v. Target Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Jehul Bello, Marcus Camacho, Logan Danson and others
Defendant:
Target Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, Target Corporation and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Chomorro-Rodriguez v. Garland
as 24-366
Petitioner:
YUVINI SANTIAGO CHOMORRO-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
