Cases 21 - 30 of 186
Dignity Health, et al v. Will Lightbourne, et al
as 21-16295
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DIGNITY HEALTH, a California non-profit corporation and DIGNITY COMMUNITY CARE, a Colorado non-profit corporation
Plaintiff:
SAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, HANFORD COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, FEATHER RIVER HOSPITAL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
WILL LIGHTBOURNE, in his official capacity as the Director of the California Department of Health Care Services, RAUL RAMIREZ, in his official capacity as Chief of the DHCS Office of Health Information Technology, BRUCE LIM, in his official capacity as DHCS Deputy Director of Audits and Investigations Branch; and others
San Joaquin Community Hospital, et al v. Will Lightbourne, et al
as 21-16294
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, a California nonprofit reiigious corporation, DBA Adventist Health Bakersfield, HANFORD COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, a Califonria nonprofit religious corporation and as successor in interest to Central Valley General Hospital, fka Central Valley General Hospital, DBA Adventist Health Hanford, FEATHER RIVER HOSPITAL, a Califonria nonprofit religious corporation, DBA Adventist Health Feather River and others
Defendant / Appellee:
WILL LIGHTBOURNE, in his official capacity as the Director of the California Department of Health Care Services, RAUL RAMIREZ, in his official capacity as Chief of the DHCS Office of Health Information Technology, BRUCE LIM, in his official capacity as DHCS Deputy Director of Audits and Investigations Branch; and others
Defendant:
RICHARD FIGUEROA
The Estate of Yaeli Mozzelle Galdamez et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2021cv05971
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Yaeli Mozzelle Galdamez, Andrew Galdamez, Andrew Elijah Martinez and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Pomona Valley Hospital, Dr Kalpesh Bhavar, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UHS-Corona, Inc., et al v. Optum Services, Inc., et al
as 21-55751
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UHS-CORONA, INC., DBA Corona Regional Medical Center, UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES OF RANCHO SPRINGS, INC., DBA Inland Valley Medical Center, a Campus of Southwest Healthcare System, DBA Rancho Springs Medical Center, a Campus of Southwest Healthcare System and TEMECULA VALLEY HOSPITAL, INC., DBA Temecula Valley Hospital
Defendant / Appellant:
OPTUM SERVICES, INC., NORTH AMERICAN MEDICAL MANAGEMENT CALIFORNIA, INC., PRIMECARE MEDICAL NETWORK, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ralph A. Schwartz, P.C. v. Snyder et al
as 2:2021cv00909
Defendant:
Healthcare Revenue Recovery Group, LLC doing business as HHRG, Valley Health System LLC doing business as Spring Valley Hospital Medical Center, Plusfour Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ralph A. Schwartz, P.C.
Cross Defendant:
Valley Health System LLC, Dignity Health, Healthcare Revenue Recovery Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Mireles v. Valley Hospital et al
as 2:2021cv00526
Defendant:
Shirley Lindsey, Metro Police Department and Valley Hospital
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Matthew Mireles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coachella Valley Hospitality Unites v. Gavin Newsom et al
as 5:2021cv00366
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Erica S. Pan, Gavin Newsom and others
Plaintiff:
Coachella Valley Hospitality Unites
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coachella Valley Hospitality Unites v. Gavin Newsom et al
as 2:2021cv01878
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Erica S. Pan and Gavin Newsom
Plaintiff:
Coachella Valley Hospitality Unites
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calm Ventures LLC v. Gavin Newsom et al
as 2:2020cv11501
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Gavin Newsom, Erica Pan, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Calm Ventures LLC, dba Pineapple Hill Saloon & Grill, BK Salons LLC a California Limited Liability Company doing business as Pomp Salon, NTDH Holdings, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Images Luxury Nail Lounge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
