Cases 21 - 30 of 348
Brouhard v. The Geo Group, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01578
Plaintiff:
Toby Brouhard
Defendant:
The Geo Group, Inc. a Florida corporation doing business in California doing business as Geo California, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6961 Federal Facilities Compliance Act
(PS) Rivers v. Parker et al
as 2:2023cv01143
Plaintiff:
Keith Rivers
Defendant:
Larry Parker, Daniel Kanyam, Joy Levine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts v. Mulpuri et al
as 4:2023cv02248
Plaintiff:
Alexandre Roberts
Defendant:
Rao Mulpuri, Vidul Prakash, Toby Cosgrove and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Gibbs et al v. Livefree Emergency Response, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Gibbs, Toby Hoy and Sharon McCullagh
Defendant:
Livefree Emergency Response, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2023cv05204
Plaintiff:
Toby Higa
Defendant:
Legacy Health and northwest acute care specialists
Dental Health Services Inc et al v. Miller et al
as 2:2023cv00383
Plaintiff:
Dental Health Services, Inc., Dental Health Services and Dental Health Services of America
Defendant:
Toby Miller, Josh Nace and DOES 1 through 50
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
