Cases 21 - 30 of 209
Myers et al v. U.S. IRS
as 2:2023at00226
Plaintiff:
Donna M. Myers and Michael Davies
Defendant:
United States Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Soledad Solano, et al v. IRSIn re: Soledad Solano, et al v. IRS
as 23-55040
Debtor:
In the Matter of: SOLEDAD SOLANO
Appellant:
SOLEDAD SOLANO
Appellee:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Dean Steeves v. IRS
as 22-56219
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEAN ALLEN STEEVES
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Carrie Loomis v. IRS
as 22-36055
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARRIE LOOMIS, as Trustee of the LOST CREEK TRUST
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Dean Steeves v. IRS
as 22-56170
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEAN ALLEN STEEVES
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
John Demos, Jr. v. United States Federal Reserve Board, et al
as 22-35839
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD, JEROME POWELL, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF ENGRAVING AND PRINTING and others
Alizadeh et al v. MFUG Union Bank N.A. et al
as 2:2022mc00248
Plaintiff:
Kobra Alizadeh, Abe Alizadeh, Parvaneh Alizadeh and others
Defendant:
MFUG Union Bank N.A. and United States Internal Revenue Service
Alizadeh et al v. MFUG Union Bank N.A. et al
as 2:2022at00843
Plaintiff:
Kobra Alizadeh, Abe Alizadeh, Parvaneh Alizadeh and others
Defendant:
MFUG Union Bank N.A. and United States Internal Revenue Service
John Demos, Jr. v. IRS, et al
as 22-35588
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES MINT, JOHN DOE and others
Lee v. United States Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2022cv01052
Plaintiff:
Chen-Hsien Lee
Defendant:
United States Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
