Cases 21 - 30 of 19,989
Ryan M. Marshall v. L. Mejia et al
as 5:2024cv01186
Plaintiff:
Ryan M. Marshall
Defendant:
L. Mejia and The Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eugene William Hillman v. Warden
as 5:2024cv01175
Petitioner:
Eugene William Hillman
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Derrick Lamar Hairston v. Warden
as 2:2024cv04855
Petitioner:
Derrick Lamar Hairston
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael R. Spengler v. CDCR et al
as 2:2024cv04759
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Spengler, Jr.
Defendant:
CDCR, Does 1-10, Officers of B Yard Building 1, Does 1-10, Medical Administration and Doctor of Control of B Yard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mrozek v. Eaton et al
as 3:2024cv03324
Plaintiff:
Bradley James Mrozek
Defendant:
Warden Patrick Eaton, CDCR Director Ron Broomfield, Voc. Instructor T. Ismans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Spengler v. CDCR et al
as 2:2024cv01573
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Spengler Jr.
Defendant:
CDCR, Warden, Internal Revenue Service, Fresno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sandoval v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00789
Petitioner:
Ysela Sandoval
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Doyle v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Doyle
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Warden William Gittere, Christopher Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leibel v. Reubart, et al.
as 24-3395
Petitioner:
TATIANA LEIBEL
Respondent:
REUBART, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Hatchett v. Clark
as 4:2024cv03246
Petitioner:
Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Respondent:
Warden Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
