Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Bennett et al v. The Islamic Republic of Iran et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv05807
Plaintiff: Michael Bennett and Linda Bennett
Defendant: The Islamic Republic of Iran, The Iranian Ministry of Information and Security, Franklin Resources, Inc. doing business as Franklin Templeton Fiduciary Trust and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Estate of Meir Kahane, Estate of Judith Greenbaum, Bank Melli and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Franklin Resources, Inc. and Visa Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ebony Batts, et al v. William Adams, Jr., et al Featured Case
as 11-56921
Plaintiff - Appellant: EBONY LATRICE BATTS, an individual, AKA Phoenix Phenom and MANFRED MOHR, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: WILLIAM ADAMS, Jr., all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, ALLAN PINEDA, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, JAIME GOMEZ, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas and others
Donald Wortman, et al v. Vietnam Airlines, et al
as 11-16425
: In re: TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIR TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: DONALD WORTMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, WILLIAM ADAMS, MARGARET GARCIA and others
Defendant: AIR NEW ZEALAND, ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS, CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS and others
Defendant - Appellant: VIETNAM AIRLINES
Donald Wortman, et al v. Thai Airways International, et al
as 11-16340
: In re: TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIR TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: DONALD WORTMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, WILLIAM ADAMS, MARGARET GARCIA and others
Defendant: AIR NEW ZEALAND, ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS, CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS and others
Defendant - Appellant: THAI AIRWAYS INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC COMPANY LTD.
Ebony Latrice Batts et al v. William Adams, Jr. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv08123
Defendant: William Adams, Jr., Cherry River Music Co., EMI April Music, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Ebony Latrice Batts and Manfred Mohr
Bryan Pringle v. William Adams Jr et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2010cv01656
Defendant: Cherry River Music Co, EMI April Music Inc, Stacy Ferguson and others
Plaintiff: Bryan Pringle
IN EQUITY C-125-B: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. WALKER RIVER IRRIGATION, ET AL. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:1973cv00127
Counter Defendant: "A" Enterprise, 14 Sara Circle Land Trust, 1997 Revocable Family Trust and others
Interested Party: Linda Ackley, National Fish and Wildlife Foundation and Chief Deputy Water C Jim Shaw
Defendant: Ernie Angeles, Donald Berirati, William S. Boyanich and others
Counter Claimant: Wayne D. Bowman, Manuel L. Puerta, Jr. and Gerald J. Wright
Cross Defendant: Scott DeChambeau
Creditor: Rees Trust dtd 4/14/03
Special Master: U.S. Board of Water Commissioners
Plaintiff: United States Of America
Intervenor Plaintiff: Walker River Paiute Tribe
Estate of Michael Heiser et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al
as 2:2009mc00105
Plaintiff: Estate of Michael Heiser, Estate of Peter J. Morgera, Thomas Morgera and others
Defendant: Islamic Republic of Iran, Iranian Ministry of Information and Security and Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type: Other Statutes None
Adams et al v. Estate of Michael Heiser et al
as 2:2009at01878
Defendant: Estate of Michael Heiser, Estate of Peter J. Morgera, deceased, Thomas Morgera and others
Plaintiff: Daniel Adams, Mary Young, Elizabeth Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type: Other Statutes None
Williams v. Adams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00464
Plaintiff: Lamont Williams
Defendant: William Adams, Ed Peterman, Greg Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?