Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 383
Surjit Soni v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, et al
as 22-55966
Appellant: SURJIT P. SONI, an individual, DBA The Soni Law Firm
Defendant: CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NUMBERS YL050600C/011
Counter Claimant: CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NUMBERS AP0166962016/0014
Type: Contract Insurance
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd' s, London v. Allied Professionals Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022cv01852
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd' s, London
Defendant: Allied Professionals Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Trek Bicycle Corporation et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 2:2022cv07367
Plaintiff: Trek Bicycle Corporation and Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's Subscribing to Policy No. B0507CG2001431
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company, Ocean Network Express North America, Inc., Ocean Network Express PTE LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Lexington Insurance Company, et al v. Cindy Smith, et al
as 22-35784
Plaintiff / Appellant: LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, HOMELAND INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, HALLMARK SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant / Appellee: CINDY SMITH, in her official capacity as Chief Judge for the Suquamish Tribal Court, ERIC NIELSEN, in his official capacity as Chief Judge of the Suquamish Tribal Court of Appeals, BRUCE DIDESCH, in his official capacity as Judge of the Suquamish Tribal Court of Appeals and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: SUQUAMISH TRIBE
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Subscribing to Policy No. 600230 v. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv06188
Petitioner: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Subscribing to Policy No. 600230
Respondent: Expeditors International of Washington Inc, Expeditors International Ocean and Doe
Not Classified By Court: Stephen M Uthoff
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Viasat Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01169
Plaintiff: Viasat Inc.
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Anderson
as 1:2022cv00331
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
Defendant: Kim E. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Type: Contract Insurance
American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. Old Republic Insurance Company et al
as 2:2022cv04614
Plaintiff: American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance Company
Defendant: Old Republic Insurance Company, Hudson Insurance Company and Certain Underwriters at Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's Subscribing to Policy No. MC90000221WC90000221 v. Integrity Express Logistics et al.
as 4:2022cv03200
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's Subscribing to Policy No. MC90000221WC90000221
Defendant: Integrity Express Logistics, KSN Trans Inc and GMB Transport Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Calistoga Ranch Owner LLC et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv03188
Plaintiff: Calistoga Ranch Owner LLC, Calistoga Ranch Investors LLC and Calistoga Ranch Club
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, International Insurance Company of Hannover SE N/K/A HDI Global Specialty SE and Premier Claims Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?