Cases 31 - 40 of 90
Lawrence Salisbury v. Caritas Acquisitions V, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv08247
Defendant:
Chuck Polson, Real Estate Consulting and Services, Inc., City of Santa Monica and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Salisbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Carlos Wayne Dunnigan v. Santa Monica Police Department et al
as 2:2018cv01024
Plaintiff:
Carlos Wayne Dunnigan
Defendant:
Enrique Esparza, Enrique Esparza, Francisco Franko and others
Marco Gonzalez v. City of Santa Monica
as 2:2017cv08029
Defendant:
City of Santa Monica
Plaintiff:
Marco Gonzalez
Jovany Briceno v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 2:2017cv07937
Defendant:
Former Sheriff Lee Baca, City of Santa Monica, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Jovany Briceno
Barry Rosen v. United States Government et al
as 2:2017cv07727
Respondent:
City of Santa Monica, Federal Aviation Administration and United States Government
Petitioner:
Barry Rosen
Kate Scott et al v. City Council for the City of Santa Monica et al
as 2:2017cv07329
Plaintiff:
James Babinski and Kate Scott
Defendant:
City Council for the City of Santa Monica and Does
Unknown:
Joanna L Simon
Movant:
National Business Aviation Association and Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association and Santa Monica Airport Association
Amicu:
Santa Monica Airport Association
Shirley Smith v. City of Santa Monica
as 2:2017cv01442
Defendant:
City of Santa Monica
Plaintiff:
Shirley Smith
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00723
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jehovah Hendrickson v. City of Santa Monica et al
as 2:2016cv07768
Defendant:
Officer Abenoja, Michael Chun, City of Santa Monica and others
Plaintiff:
Jehovah Hendrickson
HomeAway.com, Inc. v. City of Santa Monica
as 2:2016cv06641
Defendant:
City of Santa Monica
Plaintiff:
HomeAway.com, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
City of Los Angeles
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Airbnb, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
