Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Mario Navarro v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 13-56102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO LOUIS NAVARRO
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, DAVID LONG, MORENO and others
Mario Louis Navarro v. Matthew Cate et al
as 5:2012cv01260
Defendant:
Darral Adams, Mr. Allen, V. Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Navarro
Navarro v. Cate et.al.
as 5:2012cv02142
Plaintiff:
Mario Navarro
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, David Long, Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manuel Chairez, IV v. D. Dexter, et al
as 11-17531
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANUEL CHAIREZ, IV
Defendant - Appellee:
D. DEXTER, Warden, F. GONZALES, P. COVELLO and others
John H. Honore et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2010cv06373
Defendant:
Bato, Bato, L. Blair and others
Plaintiff:
John H. Honore
Timothy Peoples v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 09-56090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY PEOPLES
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Office of the Governor, Governor, individual capacity, CANE, LAB Sacramento, Director, individual capacity, N GRANNIS, LAB Sacramento, Chief Inmate Appeals, individual capacity and others
Robert D. Hollis v. V. Johnson et al
as 5:2009cv00395
Plaintiff:
Robert D Hollis
Defendant:
V Johnson, C Bato, Nick Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Robert D. Hollis v. R. Harrington et al
as 5:2009cv00097
Plaintiff:
Robert D Hollis
Defendant:
R Harrington, C Bato, L Bonnett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Timothy Peoples v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 08-57017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY PEOPLES
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Office of the Governor, individual capacity, CANE, LAB Sacramento, Director, individual capacity, N GRANNIS, LAB Sacramento, Chief Inmate Appeals, individual capacity and others
Sanford v. DOE et al
as 3:2008cv01049
Plaintiff:
Robert Lionel Sanford
Defendant:
DOE, L. E. Scribner, Levin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
