Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Muhammad v. North Richmond Senior Housing et al
as 3:2016cv01153
Plaintiff:
James Karim Muhammad
Defendant:
North Richmond Senior Housing, Hud and Sheri Gaffney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Turner Jr. v. USA Housing Rights et al
as 3:2015cv02968
Plaintiff:
David B. Turner Jr.
Defendant:
USA Housing Rights, San Diego Housing Committee and HUD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 4:2015cv03470
Plaintiff:
Shannon O. Murphy, Sr.
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs and HUD/VASH Program
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
George Andrew Bratton v. Riverside County Housing Authority et al
as 5:2014cv00617
Petitioner:
George Andrew Bratton
Respondent:
Ray W Brewer, Does 1-50, inclusive, Heidi Marshall and others
Unknown:
Raymond M Mistica and Raymond M Mistica
Conservatorship of the Person and Estate of Mutice Ellen Sturgis v. Secretary of HUD et al
as 5:2013cv01775
Plaintiff:
Conservatorship of the Person and Estate of Mutice Ellen Sturgis
Defendant:
Foreclosure Commissioner of HUD and Secretary of HUD
Gavin v. Murphy et al
as 4:2012cv05864
Plaintiff:
Lynn Gavin
Defendant:
Bartholomew Murphy, Michael J. Antonini, Rich Hillis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2012cv02596
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Sherriff Dept., Silvercrest Apts. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Fierro v. HUD/Housing Commission of San Diego
as 3:2012cv02465
Plaintiff:
Cristina Fierro
Defendant:
HUD and Housing Commission of San Diego
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv04743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
