Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 183
Teamsters Local Union No. 533, Affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Keolis Transit America, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00517
Defendant: Keolis Transit America, Inc.
Plaintiff: Teamsters Local Union No. 533, Affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Seitz v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv05442
Plaintiff: James E Seitz and James Edward Seitz
Defendant: Chris Griswold, Teamsters Local 986 and International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund et al v. Bayer Aktiengesellschaft et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv04737
Plaintiff: City of Grand Rapids Police & Fire Retirement System, City of Grand Rapids General Retirement System, Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund and others
Defendant: Wolfgang Nickl, Johannes Dietsch, Werner Baumann and others
Petitioner: Ohio Carpenters Pension Fund and Greater Pennsylvania Carpenters' Pension Fund
Not Classified By Court: Bank of New York Mellon and Cowen and Company, LLC
International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Local 631 v. Hydro Conduit Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00735
Respondent: Hydro Conduit Corporation
Petitioner: International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Local 631
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 631 v. Transdev Services, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00683
Petitioner: International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 631
Respondent: Transdev Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Peter Guinan v. IBOT Local 848, et al
as 20-55294
Defendant / Appellee: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL 848, DOES, 1 through 100, inclusive and SHIPPERS TRANSPORT EXPRESS, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant: PETER GUINAN
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers, Local 631 v. AECOM
as 2:2020cv00540
Plaintiff: International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers, Local 631
Defendant: AECOM
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
IBT v. NLRB
as 20-70725
Respondent: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Petitioner: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS
CTA, et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-55106
Plaintiff / Appellee: CALIFORNIA TRUCKING ASSOCIATION, THOMAS ODOM and RAVINDER SINGH
Defendant / Appellant: PATRICK W. HENNING, in his official capacity as the Director of the Employment Development Department, ANDRE SCHOORL, in his official capacity as the Acting Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California, LILIA GARCIA-BROWER, in her official capacity as Labor Commissioner of the State of California, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS
Amicus Curiae: LOS ANGELES CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, CITY OF OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA LABOR FEDERATION, AFL-CIO and others
CTA, et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 20-55107
Plaintiff / Appellee: CALIFORNIA TRUCKING ASSOCIATION, THOMAS ODOM and RAVINDER SINGH
Defendant: LILIA GARCIA-BROWER, in her official capacity as Labor Commissioner of the State of California, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, JULIE SU, in her official capacity as Secretary of the California Labor Workforce and Development Agency, ANDRE SCHOORL, in his official capacity as the Acting Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS
Amicus Curiae: CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, CITY OF OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA LABOR FEDERATION, AFL-CIO and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?