Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Gonzalez, et al., v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, et al.
as 2:2010cv00684
Defendant:
Doe Correction Officers, Doe Health Care Provider, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Edilzon Dennis Gonzalez, Jorge Gonzalez and Mario Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Northern California River Watch v. Oakland Maritime Support Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv01774
Plaintiff:
Northern California River Watch
Defendant:
Oakland Maritime Support Services, Inc., William Aboudi and Jorge Gonzalez Rivera
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Jorge Gonzalez
as 2:2009cv05226
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Jorge Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Type:
Other Statutes
Jorge Gonzalez-Espejo v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-71540
Petitioner:
JORGE GONZALEZ-ESPEJO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Six L's Packing Company Inc v. D.T. Produce Inc et al
as 2:2007cv03754
Plaintiff:
Six L's Packing Company Inc and Six L's Packing Company Inc
Defendant:
D.T. Produce Inc, Jorge Gonzalez and Delfina Trujillo
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Barnes et al v. Schwarenegger et al
as 3:2007cv00333
Plaintiff:
Gregg L Barnes, Oscar Lizarraga, Perry Jackson and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarenegger and V Alwager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jorge Gonzalez v. Jeff Wrigley, Et Al.
as 1:2007cv00236
Petitioner:
Jorge Gonzalez
Respondent:
Jeff Wrigley, Jeff Wrigley, Jeff Wrigley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mendez, et al v. Cnty of San Bernardi, et al
as 05-56118
Plaintiff:
EVANGELINA MENDEZ and ANGEL MENDEZ
Appellant:
ARTURO JORGE GONZALEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF SAN BERNADINO, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CITY OF HESPERIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
