Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Montgomery v. State Agency, Child Family Services Department et al
as 6:2009cv00677
Plaintiff:
Tamesais Montgomery
Defendant:
State Agency, Child Family Services Department, Multnomah County, Susie Biernstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montgomery v. State Compensation Insurance Fund
as 1:2009cv03045
Plaintiff:
Maurice Montgomery
Defendant:
State Compensation Insurance Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Rolstad et al v. Assisted Living Concepts, Inc.
as 2:2008cv01485
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Rolstad and Gary L. Montgomery
Defendant:
Assisted Living Concepts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Montgomery v. De Camp
as 3:2008cv01474
Petitioner:
Johnny Alexander Montgomery
Respondent:
Joe De Camp
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Montgomery v. AGC-International Union of Operating Engineers Local 701 Pension Trust Fund, Defined Benefit Plan
as 1:2008cv03129
Plaintiff:
Maurice Montgomery
Defendant:
AGC-International Union of Operating Engineers Local 701 Pension Trust Fund, Defined Benefit Plan and AGC-International Union of Operating Engineers Local 701 Pension Trust Fund, Defined Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bradford v. Clackamas County et al
as 3:2008cv00644
Plaintiff:
Travell L Bradford
Defendant:
Clackamas County, Craig Roberts, Sgt. Dunkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montie Montgomery, Inc.
as 1:2008cv03013
Plaintiff:
Montie Montgomery, Inc.
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Oregon Parks & Recreation Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
IN RE: AUSA APPOINTMENTS EXTENSIONS TERMINATIONS
as 3:2007mc09007
Plaintiff:
James E. Alexander, David J. Adler, Daphne Banay and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
