Cases 31 - 40 of 412
Shawn Edward Shaffer v. Raymond Madden
as 2:2022cv02451
Petitioner:
Shawn Edward Shaffer
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Torres v. Paredes et al
as 3:2022cv00448
Plaintiff:
Eucebio Torres
Defendant:
Officer G. Paredes, Officer A. Navarro, Officer J. Cazares and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Snyder v. Allison et al
as 3:2022cv00432
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Snyder
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison and Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mynor Varela v. Raymond Madden
as 2:2022cv01864
Petitioner:
Mynor Varela
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Madden
as 3:2022cv00356
Petitioner:
Arzuray D. Reed
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joe Anthony Jordan v. Raymond Madden
as 5:2022cv00473
Petitioner:
Joe Anthony Jordan
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nguon v. Madden
as 3:2022cv00181
Petitioner:
Hung Duong Nguon
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Guerrero v. Raymond Madden
as 5:2022cv00262
Petitioner:
David Guerrero
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyrelle Smith v. Raymond Madden
as 2:2022cv00365
Petitioner:
Tyrelle Smith
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Limbrick v. Madden
as 3:2022cv00063
Petitioner:
Adam Alexander Limbrick
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
