Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00034
Plaintiff:
Ruth Ellen Rodgers
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Alexander et al v. JC Penney Corporation Inc, et al
as 2:2011cv01781
Plaintiff:
Barbara Alexander and Rodger Alexander
Defendant:
JC Penney Corporation Inc and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv05787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Griffin v. Knezovich
as 2:2011cv00146
Petitioner:
Rodger A Griffin
Respondent:
Ozzie D Knezovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tracy v. Seattle Police Department et al
as 2:2010cv01443
Plaintiff:
Gerald B. Tracy
Defendant:
Seattle Police Department, Federal Bureau of Investigations, Washington State Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huddleston v. Cala Group International Inc et al
as 2:2010mc00006
Plaintiff:
Pat Huddleston, II
Defendant:
Cala Group International Inc, James F Crigler, Kirk Kelloway and others
Huddleston v. Cala Group International Inc et al
as 2:2010mc00005
Plaintiff:
Pat Huddleston, II
Defendant:
Cala Group International Inc, James F Crigler, Kirk Kelloway and others
May v Pacific Venture
as 2:2009cv01864
Plaintiff:
Rodger May
Defendant:
Pacific Venture, NA KOA Fishing, INC. and Master of the Pacific Venture
Intervenor_plaintiff:
The Memo Children's Trust , WR Underhill Family, LLC , Nereides Ventures, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 951 Marine Contract Actions
May
as 2:2009cv00878
Plaintiff:
Rodger May
Defendant:
Nakoa Maluhia, Nakoa Fishing Inc, Kake Seafood Alaska, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0961 Foreclosure Preferred Ship Mortgage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
