Cases 31 - 40 of 345
Rahman Rashad Rushing v. California Rehabilitation Center et al
as 5:2021cv01004
Defendant:
John Doe, California Rehabilitation Center and Cynthia Y. Tampkins
Plaintiff:
Rahman Rashad Rushing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Randi Berez v. Hightimes Holding Corp. et al
as 2:2021cv02946
Plaintiff:
Randi Berez
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Green Rush Daily, LLC, Hightimes Holding Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Ronald P. Slates v. Adama Technologies Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv01650
Defendant:
International Ambitions, LLC, Adama Technologies Corporation, Brandon Rushing and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald P. Slates
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00915
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Barth v. Mabry Carlton Ranch, Inc et al
as 5:2020cv09288
Defendant:
Longino Ranch, Inc., Mabry Carlton Ranch, Inc, Eric Sutton and others
Plaintiff:
John S Barth and John Barth
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv02459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Beal v. Green Rush Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv02195
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10 and Green Rush Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jordan Beal
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
River City Testing, et al v. Jack Cohen, et al
as 5:2020cv02198
Defendant:
Craig Rush, Eric France, Jack Cohen and others
Plaintiff:
River City Testing, Stephen Potter and Rob Schumacher
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Daniel Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Rahman R. Rushing v. Warden
as 2:2020cv07737
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Rahman R Rushing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
