Cases 31 - 40 of 1,224
Chomorro-Rodriguez v. Garland
as 24-366
Petitioner:
YUVINI SANTIAGO CHOMORRO-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bravo v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2023cv02442
Plaintiff:
Santiago I Bravo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Canales v. E.S.P.
as 3:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Santiago Canales
Defendant:
E.S.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robles Fajardo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-138
Petitioner:
JAVIER ALEXANDER ROBLES FAJARDO, SONIA YAMILETH ALMENDARES AVILA, AARON SANTIAGO ROBLES ALMENDARES and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cruz-Cruz, et al. v. Garland
as 24-136
Petitioner:
ALEJANDRO JOSE CRUZ-CRUZ, SANTIAGO ALEJANDRO CRUZ-HERNANDEZ, MIRNA REBECA HERNANDEZ DE CRUZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez-Castillo, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4417
Petitioner:
KATHERINE PAOLA MARTINEZ-CASTILLO, ANGEL SANTIAGO SOLORZANO-MARTINEZ, ANGEL GAEL SOLORZANO-MARTINEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Santiago v. Walmart Inc.
as 1:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Frank Santiago
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Martinez v. City of Santa Maria, et al.
as 23-4277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTEBAN MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SANTA MARIA, PHIL HANSEN, JESUS VALLE, No 19091 and others
Neeley v. Goodyear, City of et al
as 2:2023cv02319
Plaintiff:
Marshun Neeley
Defendant:
Goodyear, City of, Goodyear Police Department, Santiago Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy D. Wilkins v. E. Lozano et al
as 2:2023cv09163
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Wilkins
Defendant:
E. Lozano, M. Benetes, Santiago Olmos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
