Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011at01134
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011at01121
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Peter Tia v. Baker, et al
as 11-15689
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER RAY TIA
Defendant - Appellee:
BAKER, Lt., LINDA RIVERA, COSTA, A/CO and others
Tia v. Lt. Baker et al
as 1:2011cv00098
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Lt. Baker, Linda Rivera, A/CO Costa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noe Vega v. USDC-CAS
as 09-72545
:
In re: NOE ORGAZ VEGA
Petitioner:
NOE ORGAZ VEGA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Real Party In Interest:
CAROL LAMS, U.S. Attorney Office, SALVADOR LOPEZ, U.S. Border Patrol, RON SMITH, Director of the San Diego field office Immigration and Custom Enforcement and others
Krieg v. Dawson et al
as 2:2009cv00757
Plaintiff:
Harold Brian Krieg
Defendant:
Kent J Dawson, Judge, Roger L. Hunt, U.S. District Court for Nevada and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehic
McElhinney v. Astrue et al
as 4:2007cv00212
Plaintiff:
Russell E. McElhinney
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bachelier v. Astrue et al
as 4:2007cv00172
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, Michael J. Astrue, U.S. Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Leslee M. Bachelier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bachelier v. Astrue et al
as 4:2007at10076
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, U.S. Attorney's Office and U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Leslee M. Bachelier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Delgado v. Astrue et al
as 4:2007at10059
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, U.S. Attorney's Office and Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Angelica Delgado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
