Cases 31 - 40 of 44
William Myers v. US Marshals Service
as 11-55840
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM THOMAS MYERS
Defendant - Appellee:
US MARSHALS SERVICE
Raymond Foss v. US Marshals Service, et al
as 11-16129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND C. FOSS
Defendant - Appellee:
US MARSHALS SERVICE, REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT, TODD ROWEN, Officer and others
Marshek v. Geo Group, Inc et al
as 3:2011cv00326
Plaintiff:
Tyson Marshek
Defendant:
Geo Group, Inc , Noonan , Trautmann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Myers v. US Marshals Service
as 3:2010cv02662
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Myers
Defendant:
US Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shawn Woodall v. C. Trujillo, et al
as 10-55757
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN JAMES ALLEN WOODALL
Defendant - Appellee:
C. TRUJILLO, JOHN MINNICH and US MARSHAL SERVICE
Shawn Woodall v. US Marshal Service, et al
as 10-55724
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN JAMES ALLEN WOODALL
Defendant - Appellee:
US MARSHAL SERVICE and JOHN MINNICH
Strolberg, et al v. Akal Security, Inc., et al
as 1:2003cv00004
Plaintiff:
Ron Strolberg , Charles Hawkins , Carl Benjamin and others
Defendant:
US Marshals Service , Justice, US Dept of and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
United States of America v. Five Pieces of Miscellaneous Jewelry
as 8:2008cv00957
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Five Pieces of Miscellaneous Jewelry
Miscellaneou:
US Marshal Service
Claimant:
Robert Guzman
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Foss v. US Marshal Services, et al
as 2:2008cv01791
Plaintiff:
Raymond C. Foss
Defendant:
US Marshals Service, Redding Police Department, Todd Rowen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barron-Oseguera v. US Marshal Service
as 1:2008cv00541
Plaintiff:
Marcos Barron-Oseguera
Defendant:
US Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
