Cases 31 - 40 of 74
Cummer v. Jones
as 4:2013cv00263
Petitioner:
William Thomas Cummer
Respondent:
Katie Dawn Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dorothy Thomas et al v. Caldera Medical Inc et al
as 2:2013cv01665
Defendant:
American Medical Systems Inc, Caldera Medical Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Thomas and William Thomas
William Thomas Hussey v. David Long
as 5:2013cv00302
Petitioner:
William Thomas Hussey
Respondent:
David Long
Howell et al v. ITC Service Group, Inc.
as 2:2012cv02923
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Howell and Cheryl Howell
Defendant:
ITC Service Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Howell et al v. ITC SERVICE GROUP, INC.
as 2:2012at01552
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Howell and Cheryl Howell
Defendant:
ITC SERVICE GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Stephen Yagman v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 2:2012cv10104
Defendant:
David Benson, Patricia E Black, Pascal Boillat and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Yagman
Walden et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2012cv04641
Plaintiff:
Virgil Walden, Jr. , Ronald Thompson , James Herring and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. L.L.C. , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nabil Farag v. Raymond Vatne, Jr., et al
as 12-35717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NABIL W. FARAG
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND TOM VATNE, Jr., THURSTON COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON and others
Palumbo et al v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv00206
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Palumbo and Mary Suzanne Palumbo
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
William Coats v. HDSP, et al
as 12-15195
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM THOMAS COATS
Defendant - Appellee:
HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, R. MIRANDA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
