Cases 31 - 40 of 1,744
Iseli v. State of California et al
as 3:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Branden Willie Iseli
Defendant:
State of California, County of San Joaquin, United States District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Iseli v. The State of California et. al.
as 3:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Branden Willie Iseli
Defendant:
The State of California and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv00837
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv00821
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Iseli v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv00800
Plaintiff:
Branden Willie Iseli
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch and William D Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Davis v. People of San Joaquin
as 2:2024cv00734
Petitioner:
Willis Davis
Respondent:
People of San Joaquin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Poon-Atkins et al v. Poon et al
as 4:2024cv01345
Plaintiff:
Christy Poon-Atkins, Rhonda Barnette, Kesha Poon and others
Defendant:
John Poon and David Poon
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv00681
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Albrigo v. Sunny Delight Beverages Co.
as 3:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Laura Willis Albrigo
Defendant:
Sunny Delight Beverages Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453 Class Action Fairness Act
Hardrick v. Olsen et al
as 5:2024cv00853
Plaintiff:
Bernard A. Hardrick
Defendant:
A. Olsen, Cathy M. Garrett, Shantel Word and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
